Skip to content
Founder Atlas

Aligning AI with human intent: A discussion with Mira Murati, OpenAI | Cutting Edge

Key ideas

Murati describes how OpenAI chooses what to build and aligns models to human intent, and why fixing bias or safety problems takes repeated auditing after each intervention.

From a machine transcript of the audio. Quotes link to the moment they are said.

  1. 1

    How OpenAI chose language and code

    Murati says OpenAI started with language because so much data exists, because some consider mastering it a mark of intelligence, and because instructions in natural language make alignment easier. Code came partly because many people at OpenAI program, which gives quick feedback on whether a tool is useful.

  2. 2

    Aligned GPT-3 proved more useful

    Murati says GPT-3 was first trained only to predict the next word, then aligned to human intent using reinforcement learning from human feedback. OpenAI found the aligned version safer and more reliable, and businesses preferred it, which she describes as safety research gaining a practical application.

  3. 3

    Every fix needs an audit afterward

    When OpenAI removed violent and sexual images from DALL-E 2's training data, Murati says an audit showed bias had grown: a prompt for a CEO went from mostly white men to only white men. Other techniques were then needed to restore balance, and she calls the problem hard both sociologically and technically.

  4. 4

    Open use cases one at a time

    Murati says OpenAI goes use case by use case and so far has not applied its models to military uses, because it does not feel able to mitigate all the risks. She treats military or medical settings, and maybe legal ones, without a human in control as high stakes, and says the models are not there yet.

  5. 5

    Measure AGI by the generalization gap

    Murati suggests judging distance from AGI by what humans do well and machines do not, especially applying existing heuristics in new settings with little instruction. She notes that a system trained on one data set may not work as expected when deployed somewhere completely different.

In Mira’s words

“And what we discovered was that not only this is safer and more reliable, but it's actually more useful for businesses. And businesses prefer this to the raw GPT-3 model.”
Mira Murati·Aligning AI with human intent: A discussion with Mira Murati, OpenAI | Cutting Edge·Watch at 14:16(opens the original in a new tab)
“Even once you take action, you need to audit what has happened to the system and figure out how to get a good balance.”
Mira Murati·Aligning AI with human intent: A discussion with Mira Murati, OpenAI | Cutting Edge·Watch at 17:54(opens the original in a new tab)
“A good framework to think about how far we are from AGI is to think about the gap between what humans are good at and where machines are actually not good.”
Mira Murati·Aligning AI with human intent: A discussion with Mira Murati, OpenAI | Cutting Edge·Watch at 27:10(opens the original in a new tab)

About this entry

Published
Jun 28, 2022
Channel
CogX
Type
Video
Length
41:40
Language
English
Added
Nov 2, 2026
Source last checked
Nov 2, 2026

What’s available here

  • Original source

    Linked. Opens on YouTube.

  • Player on this page

    Available. YouTube’s own player, loaded only when you press play.

  • Full text or transcript

    Not reviewed. No license to show a text version here.

  • Our summary

    Draft. Written by us with AI from a machine transcript of the video’s audio (Whisper) and checked against it. Machine transcripts can mishear; each quote links to the moment so you can hear it. Not yet rights-reviewed.

  • Ask questions with AI

    Not reviewed. Off until there is licensed text to work from.